So how does a city that has set an ambitious but achievable carbon emissions reduction goal go about actually achieving that target? They calculate their carbon footprint and determine how many emissions they have to reduce and then set targets to reduce emissions by sector that add up to the overall community-wide target.
Local governments need to have the following to mobilize support for carbon reduction commitments and strategies:
An Energy Map offers a snapshot of base-year energy use and emissions; a Carbon Wedge graphic depicts projected future emissions and reduction scenarios; and a set of high-level carbon reduction strategies that a city can feasibly implement drives action.
These graphical depictions are valuable communication and framing tools for city officials and staff because they provide a sense of the scale of efforts necessary to achieve an ambitious carbon emissions reduction target in a more accessible way than a spreadsheet full of numbers and/or GHG pie charts.
To create Energy Maps for communities, we use a German software called e!Sankey that displays energy use and emissions in graphic similar to the US Energy Information Administration’s annual flow charts for the United States. Using basic energy purchase data from local electric and natural gas utilities, as well as estimates of vehicle miles traveled from the local metropolitan planning organization, we calculate the energy and carbon values by source and sector and use the Sankey software to produce tan energy flow diagram.
The boxes and flow lines are proportionally sized to reflect the relative percentages that each energy source contributes and the graphic displays a community’s residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation energy use compared to one another, and which fuels power them. Community leaders and stakeholders can easily see in full color which sources and sectors are their greatest challenges to reduce.
We used vehicle miles traveled data for transportation that regional transportation authorities or the state provides; electricity and natural gas consumption for commercial, residential, and industrial uses obtained that local utilities maintain; and projected population growth provided by city of county staff.
Figure 1 above shows an Energy Map for the City of Shoreline in 2012. Seattle City Light provides Shoreline's electricity, which is almost 100% clean, as the map clearly shows with the largest source hydroelectric power, small contributions from other renewables, nuclear, and a tiny contribution from coal. A clean electricity supplies means that a city will have to concentrate its carbon-reduction efforts on decreasing petroleum use in the transportation sector and reducing the use of fossil fuels, such as natural gas, to heat buildings.
Energy Maps are read from left to right. Total carbon emissions are depicted by the gray flow lines, by both source (on the left) and end use (on the right). You will note that the GHG emissions amount will be the same at the source as in the uses. Carbon-free energy will not contribute to the GHG emissions on the left side of the map, while on the right side, the gray flow lines display the GHG emissions by residential, commercial, and industrial sector.
Electricity: The blue flow line represents hydropower energy used for electricity generation; green represents non-hydropower renewable energy used for electricity generation (solar or wind); the brown represents nuclear energy used for electricity generation; and the red represents coal energy used for electricity generation. If natural gas is used to generate electricity, there will be a yellow line leading to the Electricity Generation box, as is the case in Issaquah below, but not in the case of Shoreline above.
Heating: The yellow flow lines represent natural gas used for electricity generation and direct heating for residential and commercial uses.
Transportation: The brown flow line represents petroleum used for transportation.
The cleaner the electricity, the greater the emissions will be in the other sectors, as the following Energy Maps make amply clear. Puget Sound Energy, which still has approximately 26% of its power derived from coal, provides electricity for the City of Issaquah. Figure 2 below clearly shows the difference that coal and natural gas for the electricity sector make in a community’s carbon footprint.
Issaquah’s population in 2016 was 37,322, while the City of Shoreline’s population was almost twice that at 55,333 in the same year, yet Issaquah’s GHG emissions were 276,000, while Shoreline’s were 200,000, largely due to the presence of coal in Issaquah’s electricity supply.
Next up after setting a reduction target and mapping a community's energy sources and uses, is determining how to achieve the required carbon reductions. For that we turn to Carving Up Carbon Reduction Strategies.
Eileen V. Quigley is Founder and Executive Director of the Clean Energy Transition Institute.
Eileen spent seven years at Climate Solutions identifying the transition pathways off oil and coal to a low-carbon future in Washington and Oregon. She built and led the New Energy Cities program, which partnered with 22 Northwest cities and counties to reduce carbon emissions. As Director of Strategic Innovations, she oversaw New Energy Cities, as well as Sustainable Advanced Fuels, which worked to accelerate the development of advanced low-carbon fuels for aviation, marine, and fleets and the Northwest Biocarbon Initiative, which aimed to demonstrate the role that...